|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Breast
Carcinoma Associated Antigen Test, Blood |
| |
|
Serum or plasma testing for CA27.29 |
This agent is one of several "tumor marker" antigens which can
be detected in a patient's blood. Being manufactured for different
test systems or by different test manufacturers may lead to different
names for the same (or nearly the same) test...the "name" tending
to indicate the specific antibody. CA27.29 is a one-epitope antibody
(automated testing on the Chiron ACS system) generated against a
particular antigen epitope on a mucinous glycoprotein in the MUC1
family (there are 6-7 MUC families). The histology IHC marker, EMA,
roughly corresponds to the membrane location of MUC1
. This test is a breast cancer test, and it is best used as a serial test
wherein doctors are looking for increases or decreases from whatever the baseline
level was at the starting point. It is essential for patients to keep in mind
that the "normal range" for most lab tests is + or - 2 standard deviations from
the "mean" of values found in a group of normal people (rule of thumb: "normal" includes
about the 85% of normals closest to the mean). CA15.3 is roughly the same test
but performed on the Abbott IMx system (and, on the same test sample, elevations
likely not proportional...so, need to serial test by the same method)
.
|
Key Uses
- post-biopsy imaging detection of questionable small liver,
lung, etc. possible mets (especially if too small for PET scan):
normal/negative is meaningless; clearly elevated supports likelihood
of mets[LMC-02-4883]
- monitor breast cancer treatment...see if high levels drop with
treatment; but, serum changes lag so slowly that changes in imaging
status (size and number of liver mets) are the most timely indicator
of therapeutic response
- monitor for recurrence from a state of cure/remission...see
if levels start rising.
- as a clue to the origin of a cancer "of unknown primary"...high
levels mean "look for breast".
- in presurgical chemo case (systemic mets at time of initial
diagnosis) that comes to mastectomy and has positive ALNs with
significant extranodal spread, significantly elevated marker
level would be grounds not to radiate axilla [LMC-01-4378]
Causes of Decreased Values/Levels:
- normal range is down to zero
- one hopes to see decreases (or at least a halt in rising levels)
during cancer treatment (see above)
Causes of INCREASED (>30U/mL) Values/Levels:
- high breast-cancer-caused elevations: value tends to correlate
with tumor burden1
- 2% of normals run a mildly elevated value [ warning] (less so with CA27.29 than CA 15.3)3
- rare (3 of 253 cases) patients develop an elevation
which remains steady...a test-system artifact/discordance (can't
be confirmed by Western Blot test)
- breast cancer recurrence elevations more likely with metastases
to lung, liver, or bone (so, in general, test is only 77% good
that an isolated elevation means a recurrence has taken place).
- may not elevate early with breast cancer recurrence elsewhere
(so, in general, test is only 90% good that an isolated "normal
value" means no recurrence)
- other adenocarcinomas: pancreatic, lung, ovarian, and colorectal3
- some benign breast diseases2,4
- cysts or benign tumors of ovary (even common follicular cysts)4
- cases with uterine fibroids (leiomyomata)
- intestinal/colonic
problems: from irritable bowel syndrome, to enteritis,
to colitis.
- medications: Paxil
- hypothyroidism4 or anything slowing down liver metabolism
of the antigen4
- chronic hepatitis and/or cirrhosis of the liver2,3,4
- sarcoidosis3,4
- tuberculosis3,4
- systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)3,4
|
Test Synonyms:
Other names for this exact or approximate agent are: breast carcinoma
associated antigen; MAM6; milk mucin antigen; CA 15.3 (a two-epitope
test automated on the Abbott IMx system); MCA; CA549; CA M26; and
CA M29. CA27.29 antigen is detected by an antibody to an epitope
in the protein core of this MUC1 protein.
References:
- Clinical Chemistry, May 1999, page 630 (technical info.)
- Interpretation of Diagnostic Tests, Wallach, 2000, 7th Ed.,
pages 904-905.
- The Handbook of Clinical Pathology [text], McKenna & Keffer,
2nd Ed., 2000, p. 268.
- Aguiar-Bujanda D, et. al., "False Elevations...",
letter, The Breast J. 10(4):375-6, July/August 2004
|
| (posted 23 Dec. 2000; latest addition, 27 October
2004) |
|
|
© Copyright
1999 - 2006, all rights reserved, Pathology Associates Of Lexington,
P.A. |
| |