|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Herpes
simplex virus I or II specification status, blood |
| |
|
Type specific Herpes simplex virus II ("select test")
antibody, serum
|
(not for neonatal
or non-neonate acute systemic infection testing which needs IFA-type of IgG & IgM
serology for HSV I & HSV
II) |
Patients & physicians often present with ACUTE lesions &, directly or indirectly, want to know if it is herpetic. Local gynecologic speakers tell
us that acute, apparently "first" lesions, can be managed as if herpetic until several weeks later when serologic testing can then be performed at a time when the
antibody level has become detectible. Or they want to know if a CHRONIC HSV
status is type I or II. Type I tends to infrequently recurr; type II tends to frequently recurr.
In our lab, this " Herpes Select 2" is
a type-specific western-blot-like "strip immunoblot" for
IgG antibodies test on patient's serum which differentiates between
HSV I & II by antibody detection of either the IgG HSV I type
specific glycoprotein gG-1 or the IgG HSV II type specific glycoprotein
gG-2. The reagent antigens are by recombinant preparations (Focus
Technology's HerpesSelect Immunoblot (IB) strip tests). Color producing
reactions are by ELISA. The one for HSV II has, by comparison to
UW-WB testing, a sensitivity of 97-100% and a specificity of 94-98%
in clinical trials. We started reporting this test from LML on
29 October 2004. [HSV testing]
Negative, Non reactive, undetectible status:
- persons (1) with a lesion NOT due to herpes & (2) who have never had HSV II.
- HSV II infected persons whose Ab level has not yet reached
detectibilty.
- previously infected persons who (1) did not mount a detectible
level of Ab (may or may not be "immune") or (2) whose antibody level has receeded to nondetectible levels.
- previously infected persons who have become seriously immunocompromised
and cannot produce detectible Ab.
Elevated, reactive, or positive results:
-
true evidence of HSV II present or past infection.
-
false positive of undetermined etiology: the
lower the disease prevalence in the population of the tested
patient (high prevalence in STD clinic...expected low prevalence
in children), the lower the positive predictive value (a positive
test of 98% specificity when the expected disease prevalence
is only 3% has a positive predictive value of just 0.61).
References:
- Ashley RL, "Performance and Use of HSV...", Herpes
9 (2):38-45, 2002. (JBC & LML)
- Focus Diagnostic's website about
this.
(posted 30 October 2004; lates
addition 7 November 2007) |
|
|
© Copyright
1999 - 2006, all rights reserved, Pathology Associates Of Lexington,
P.A. |
| |