| |
|
| LCHSD (Lexington County Health Services District) does business
as Lexington Medical Center (LMC) as a special charitable services
political district in South Carolina. Pathology Associates of
Lexington, P. A.'s (PAL) pathologist efforts in behalf of the
LCHSD, its organized medical staff, and patients in general come
under the heading of "Part A" (as to Medicare, Medicaid,
and TriCare) or professional component of pathology & laboratory
services..."professional component services". Such
services are far more than just "administrative
services", although they impact administrative
things. One of our earlier documents relative to the commitment
to effect quality & appropriateness
of Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine services was
published 20 January 1988. The
service area is central S. C., primarily west of the Broad & Congaree
Rivers & to Orangeburg, Aiken, Edgefield, and Newberry counties.
We serve by exclusive contract between PAL & LCHSD for provision of
medical direction and diagnostic pathology services. The LMC
main-hospital laboratory has quadrupled it’s test volume
from 712 tests per day in FY ’85 to 2700 tests per day
in FY ’03…while keeping total dept. costs/billable
test trend line "flat" since FY ’84 (even unadjusted
for inflation). This clinical lab testing starts in behalf of
South Carolina’s busiest ER and a broad medical and surgical
acute-care spectrum of diagnosis and treatment. The exclusive
commitment of our group to LMC since 1971 has been predicated
on the knowledge that "morphologic" testing and medical
direction are the primary domain of the pathology group, and
clinical laboratory testing is the primary domain of LMC. Additionally,
we have gone from responsibilities for only the main hospital
lab to a large spread of responsibilities having to do (from
time to time) with all of the components of the Lexington County
Health Services District (LCHSD)…CMC labs, MSO labs, Occupational
Health Lab, physician office labs, and Blood Gas lab.
Since LMC opened in late 1971, the same pathology group has
provided Pathology & Laboratory
Medicine Services at LMC. This is a group focused on the philosophy of point of service pathology, the view that patients are best served
primarily by or through physicians in their own communities. This view
recognizes the value of experts and expert local & distant referrals & consultations
but is well aware that even experts can't agree correctly (expert
discordance and see Pathology
Programs )!
Since the hospital opened in 1971, we have been an acute-care, hospital-based
pathology practice. Each doctor is licensed by the state of S. C. to practice
medicine. Each pathologist is certified by the American Board
of Pathology, and each pathologist and group-employed P. A. has undergone
intense evaluation and the granting of organized Medical Staff (repetitive
peer scrutiny) membership by the Board of Directors (influential appointed
members from our community) & granted privileges for the practice of
pathology within the LCHSD. The granted privileges are enumerated in a
departmental "delineation of privileges" statement.
And the medical staff department members operate according to defined rules
and regulations (R & R) of the organized medical staff ([a] original 15
Dec. 1976 version; [b] 1978 version;
[c] current
version). Such privileges to practice must be renewed every two years & include
QA reviews, etc., and pathologist and non-pathologist peer reviews. Our
lab has also been continually accredited by the College of American Pathologists
(since 1978-2006) & then COLA since, a status implying intense "outsider" pathologist-peer
review. Pathologists working outside of hospitals (especially in
commercial lab enterprises) are not subject to such constant peer & multidisciplinary
review & accountability.
Since about 1985 (and definitely since 1988), we pathologists
have been fully contractually responsible for every aspect
of the Lexington Medical Center Laboratory, a multi-million
dollar medical endeavor (a 9-digit figure of annual charge
volume and about 120 FTE employees). We have 24/7/365 responsibility
for general and specific details of every aspect of the operation,
day-to-day and top-to-bottom. We do this in the context of
overall institutional bylaws, medical staff bylaws, and administrative
and medical staff rules & regulations and guidelines of
the Lexington Medical Center. As Laboratory Directors, we determine who will
or will not perform in the department (hiring and firing; appropriate
caliber of personnel for each position; depth and breadth of
staffing within each segment of 24/7/365); what will
or will not be done in the department (scope and depth of services); when any
of the vast number of activities will or will not be done (what
tests are STAT, all shifts, daily, weekly, or reference-lab
send-outs); where any of these numerous around-the-clock
activities will or will not be done (geographic location of testing...bedside
or lab, doctor’s office or main lab, within which department of the
main lab, LML vs. distant reference labs); and how (what test method
and by what instrument or kit vendor) each test is done. And it is up to
us, as directors & designees, to always be able to defend the "why". How
we medically direct the laboratory effort |
| In addition to an already-above-community-standard Part
A-type PAL effort, our 7 pathologists (and 2 PAs and one AA)
input a huge amount of effort in behalf of LMC patients in
general. Each of the lab sections is directed by one of our
pathologists, who is available 24/7 for minute-to-minute input.
The intensity of commitment, service, and effort is maximal
(all pathologists "on alert" and available by phone/beeper
24/7 & one always officially "on call"). Only
a small amount, the daily work-load, is conceived and incubated
and launched just during official, on-site hours. Dr. Carter
is intensely involved, nearly full time, in directing the clinical
laboratory. The other 6 doctors are much involved in section
planning and direction, QA/QC, and medical staff efforts.
Our group employs three non-physicians: Ted Mitchell, Pathologists
Assistant, about 50% directly involved in LMC interests, Jennifer Klapper, Pathologist Assistant, and
Susie Greenthaler, Administrative Assistant, about 80% involved
in LMC interests (nearly all of their LMC-type efforts being
in support of the pathologists efforts toward "Part A").
The pathology group is importantly (not trivially) involved
in medical staff activities and in input into other areas of
the greater LMC interests (e.g., Credentials Committee chair
for over 25 years; IRB Committee chair for 11 years; and Infection
Control Committee chair for 16 years). And, our group is devoted
entirely to interests of the greater LMC (the LCHSD).
There is definite value to LMC in our devotion to keep
all pathologists on site, in the hospital (and
not in outside facilities). "On-site" equates
to "early warning" & "full court press" as to departmental direction and management and "high
intensity input". In recognition of this, the hospital
provides office space & other valuable support.
The "reach" of Lexington Medical Center indicates
to us medical directors how to make decisions in deploying
our hospital's lab capabilities. Beginning in 1971, LMC was
the first hospital in South Carolina to have its own full-time
staff of ER doctors 24/7/365; and this allowed us to develop
the lab as we have. Now, having the 1st, 2nd, or 3rd busiest
ER in South Carolina, our lab continues to emphasize rapid,
accurate, 24 hour per day centralized lab support for our ER,
Operating Rooms, and Intensive Care Unit. Yet, we have, for
example, partially decentralized & placed much glucose
testing at the bedside.
The initial pathologist contract with the then "Lexington
County Hospital" was from 1971-1981...then declared void
about August 1981. In years prior to 1980, pathologists in
the USA tended to either be paid salaries by hospitals or contracted
for services to the hospital by way of "percentage contracts"...payments
of a percentage of the lab's gross or net billings or income.
The outline below speaks to the PAL group whose next contract
was signed in 1983 for 3 pathologists…the third (Dr.
Carter) coming on board in latter half of 1984. PAL now has
10 employees (7 pathologists, 2 physician’s assistants,
and 1 administrative assistant). The present 10 employees are
all heavily involved in LMC interests, all 10 being paid for
by PAL at the same contractual support from LMC since 1983. And,
the LMC Lab fiscal performance has been consistently, commendably,
remarkably, and uniquely positive since 1987. Inflation
has risen at least 60% since 1983, cutting the value of our
unchanged Part A payment from LMC almost in half (as to purchasing
power of 1983 dollars)!! With our desire for stability with
a long-term contract, we must anticipate no less than 25% inflation
between now and 2013. We have maintained premier accreditation
through the College of American Pathologists commission on
inspection and accreditation from 1978-2006. We are now accredited by COLA. Our contract was voided
in March 2002 and has not culminated in a new contract (as
of 1 January 2007).
Now, what are the legalities behind the obligations for payment
of pathologists for these general services? As to Medicare,
the original verbiage leading up to the law in 1965 noted such
payments as Part C payments...language that was deleted for
the final 1965 law (at that time, the oldest members of our
group were finishing college). Metropolitan centers in the
northeast salaried most of their pathologists and started the
habit of being reimbursed for same by Medicare under part A;
in other areas of the USA, pathologists billed patients for
such under Part B. In 1980, Medicare sought uniformity; and
HCFA (now CMS) required that pathologist payments be through
hospitals. Congress legislated such in TEFRA in 1982. In 1983,
HCFA issued implementation rules. HCFA came up with time-related
cost amounts and an RCE ("reasonable compensation equivalent"...the
amount a pathologist's time was worth in a full
time equivalent year doing only Part A). Time counted; talent,
degree of involvement, and intensity of effort were not noted.
Upon Medicare switching to DRGs (diagnosis related groups)
for 1984, that new prospective payment system law did not address
Part A payments to pathologists. Hospital attorneys tended
to advise hospitals that the absence of the language meant
that no payments were required. But anti-kickback laws have noted
such value of pathologists' efforts and pressured hospitals
toward being fair. This position was endorsed by the federal
OIG (Office of the Inspector General) in 1991 and strongly
re-affirmed in a 27 January 2005 Supplemental Compliance Program
Guidance for Hospitals in which "fair market value" of
services is discussed.
Back To Top |
| (posted 22 December 2004; latest addition 18 April
2008) |
|
|
|