|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Decisions
by Expected Lifespan and Functional Capacity |
| |
|
| The decision to even screen for cancer...and whether to treat and
by what methods...depends on (1) desires of the patient or his/her
legal personal representative (if incapacitated) (2) the treating
doctor's estimate of likely lifespan were there no cancer, and (3)
the patient's physical condition as indicated by a performance status
assessment. This table is the ECOG criteria ( K. P. S. indicates
the corresponding scoring range within the Karnofsky Performance
Status classification). Another method is the Kaplan-Feinstein Index. |
|
Classification In Accordance with
Functional Capacity (ECOG)
|
|
0
|
Patient completely
active. Capable of performing all of his normal activities, without
restrictions, before becoming ill. (K.P.S. 90-100) |
|
1
|
Restricted in tiring,
physical activities, but ambulatory and capable of doing light or
sedentary work. (K.P.S. 70-80) |
|
2
|
Ambulatory and self
sufficient, but incapable of doing any work. Ambulatory during more
than 50% waking hours. (K.P.S. 50-60) |
|
3
|
Partially self
sufficient, confined to wheel chair or bed more than 50% of waking
hours. (K.P.S. 30-40) |
|
4
|
Incapacitated and
confined completely to bed or chair. (K.P.S. 10.20) |
|
| (posted 2 September 2003) |
|
|
© Copyright
1999 - 2006, all rights reserved, Pathology Associates Of Lexington,
P.A. |
| |